Friday, Aug. 7th, 2026

Montana's Construction Boom: What New Contractors Need to Legally Operate


Cranes dot skylines from Bozeman to Kalispell as Montana adds construction jobs faster than nearly any other state. Right now, this pace shows no sign of slowing, so plenty of people look at that demand and decide: now is the time to start a contracting business Montana can actually support.

Still, the paperwork side trips up more newcomers than the actual construction work does. Registration, proof of workers' compensation, and bonding all need to line up before a bid goes out. An agency such as Surety Bonds Agent can help sort out the bond and insurance side while the rest comes together, but beginners still need the basic understanding of how the process works. Below is a step-by-step explanation.

Montana Contractor License Rules Are Different
Most states hand out a general contractor license after a test and a background check. Montana skips the exam and calls the process registration instead.

Even though the phrase Montana contractor license gets used loosely, what the state actually issues is a Construction Contractor Registration. In a traditional sense, this is not a license. The credential runs on a two-year cycle and works as proof of workers' compensation compliance rather than a mark of skill or experience. A contractor whose registration lapses is not authorized to work in the state until it gets renewed.

Who Must Register
Not every person on a job site needs paperwork. The requirement depends on business structure and how the work is set up.

● Employers: Any business with employees that performs construction work must obtain a Construction Contractor Registration.
● Corporations and LLCs: Manager-managed LLCs and corporations in the construction trade must register regardless of employee count.
● Solo operators: Independent contractors without employees can file for an Independent Contractor Exemption Certificate rather than register.
● Exempt groups: Homeowners on their own primary residence, farm or ranch construction, and in-house maintenance staff fall outside the requirement.

Business status, not the price tag on a job, decides who has to register. Montana law does exempt work that counts as casual, minor, or inconsequential and totals less than $2,500 a job, but that exemption disappears the moment a project gets split into smaller contracts to get around the cap.

Specialty Trades Still Need a License
Electricians and plumbers do not get the easier path that general contractors get. Those trades sit under separate boards with exams and continuing education requirements.

The construction license requirements Montana sets for electrical and plumbing work include a state exam through the Board of Electrical Examiners, something general contractor registration never asks for. Asbestos and lead abatement work carries its own certification through the Department of Environmental Quality as well.

A skipped step for a licensed trade is one of the fastest ways to get a project shut down partway through.

Steps New Contractors Must Complete First
The order matters less than the checklist itself. Most of the following can happen within a few weeks since no exam board holds up the process.

The short version of how to become a licensed contractor in this state comes down to five items, not an exam:

1. Register the business: File with the Montana Secretary of State for LLC or corporation status.
2. Secure workers' compensation: Carry coverage through an approved carrier or file for the exemption certificate.
3. Submit the CCR application: Send the form and $70 fee to the Contractor Registration Unit in Helena.
4. Check specialty requirements: Confirm whether electrical, plumbing, or another licensed trade applies to the scope of work.
5. Arrange bonds and insurance: Line up general liability coverage and any bonds required for public or larger private jobs.

None of these steps involve a written exam, which surprises many contractors who come from states with tougher license boards.

The Real Cost of a Contractor Bond
Bond costs confuse newcomers more than almost anything else in this process. The premium is a small fraction of the total bond amount, not the full amount itself.

Contractor bond cost typically lands between one and three percent of the bond value for a business with solid credit, and it climbs higher for newer companies with thin credit files.





 




Rates move around based on the surety, the size of the job, and the applicant's financial history, so an early quote avoids surprises once a bid gets awarded.

Montana Construction Regulations Beyond Registration
Registration covers only one slice of the compliance picture. Montana construction regulationsalso touch permitting, job site safety, and how public projects get bonded.

Permits and Job Site Safety


Building permits run through a separate system, which means that the registration with the state is enough. Cities and counties that run a certified building department issue and inspect their own permits, while the state Building Codes Bureau steps in for the areas that have not set up a certified program. Single-family homes are generally outside the state permit process, though a certified city or county can still require one locally.

Job site safety follows a similar split. Montana has no OSHA-approved state plan, so private sector crews answer directly to federal OSHA rather than a separate state safety agency, while state and local government workers fall under their own set of Montana rules instead.

Public Project Bond Rules
Montana's version of the federal Miller Act requires performance and payment bonds on public works contracts over $50,000, though an agency can waive that rule on smaller jobs. A performance bond covers the agency if a contractor walks away before a project is finished, while a payment bond protects subcontractors and suppliers if the general contractor runs into money trouble.

Agencies rarely skip this step on larger jobs, so contractors should price the bond into their bid early to avoid a scramble once the job is awarded. The prime contractor carries the bond, not the subcontractors under them, and the bond amount tracks the full contract price rather than a flat statewide figure.

Demand Outpaces the Workforce
Growth like this brings a familiar problem: qualified crews are hard to find in most regions of the state, and that shortage is one of the biggest complaints from established contractors right now. New entrants who staff a job reliably and keep paperwork current tend to win repeat work faster than those who chase every listed job at once. That gap also means a new operation with a dependable crew can pick up work faster than an established firm still short on hands.

None of the paperwork covered here is complicated on its own, but a skipped piece, whether that is workers' compensation, a specialty license, or a bond, is what actually slows a new contractor down. Registration, permits, and bond coverage work best as one connected checklist handled before the first bid goes out, not three separate errands squeezed in after work is already underway. Contractors who get that order right spend less time chasing paperwork and more time on the job once work begins.

Add a Comment »

Montana State researcher helps rewrite understanding of how primate brain evolved


BOZEMAN
– A Montana State University paleobiologist is part of a team whose new analysis of brain evolution overturns a long-held theory about how primates, including humans, came to develop large and sophisticated brains.

The research, published this week in the journal Science, was conducted by Chris Organ, an assistant professor in the Department of Earth Sciences in MSU’s College of Letters and Science, together with a multi-institutional team of researchers. The study was led by Richard Kay, now a professor emeritus of evolutionary anthropology at Duke University, who invited the scientists, including Organ, to examine endocasts of fossil brains. Endocasts are digital, three-dimensional models of the internal surfaces of braincases that contain details about an organism’s brain anatomy, including total size, general shape, surface grooves, blood vessels and nerve exits, called foramina.

Scientists have long known that the neocortex – the outer, folded layer of the brain responsible for sensory perception, cognition and other complex functions – is greatly enlarged in primates compared to other mammals. However, because soft brain tissue does not fossilize, exactly how and why the primate neocortex grew so large over the past 56 million years has been difficult to pin down.

Organ and the other researchers spent three years examining endocasts from 137 extinct and extant, or still living, species of primates and their close relatives dating as far back as 56 million years. Their results challenge a widespread assumption in the field.

The team found that the primate frontal lobe – the brain region most often linked to advanced cognition – grew gradually and predictably over millions of years as overall brain size increased, following the same scaling pattern across all major primate groups throughout evolutionary history. The results showed no evidence of the dramatic, independent frontal lobe expansions proposed in some earlier studies that were based on visual inspection of physical fossils.

While the data indicate that primates’ frontal lobes evolved gradually, the researchers also found evidence of dramatic expansions elsewhere in the evolving primate brain – specifically in the occipital, parietal and temporal regions, which are heavily devoted to processing what an animal sees. The findings suggest that the hallmark large brains of higher primates, including humans, are an ancient feature dating back at least 33 million years and rooted in the evolution of acute vision, rather than in selection for an enlarged, thinking frontal cortex on its own.

“Our results suggest that the enlarged brains of monkeys, apes and humans are intimately tied to vision,” Organ said. “The unique data that fossils provide here help us understand how the modern primate brain evolved.”
To gauge how much visual input ancient primates’ brains received, the team measured the size of the optic foramen, the opening through which the optic nerve passes between the brain and the eye in the skull. The two groups with the largest, most vision-dominated neocortices – anthropoids, including apes and humans, and giant-eyed tarsiers – also had the largest optic foramina, which were expected based on body size. Unexpectedly, the visual processing regions of their brains grew faster than the nerves feeding them, suggesting that magnification of small increases in visual input led to large expansions of brain tissue in the two groups.

Before examining the endocasts, the researchers developed an evolutionary tree to determine exactly how each of the 137 species was related to one another. Organ, who specializes in the study of large-scale processes and patterns in evolution, explained that the tool provided the basis for the study’s analysis.

“My research mixes data from living and extinct species to figure out species evolve,” he said.  “If we had studied just extant species in this study, we wouldn’t have made any new discoveries – fossils provide a powerful framework to understand our evolutionary past.”

In addition to Organ’s expertise, MSU contributed high-performance computational work for the study on Tempest, the largest supercomputer in Montana, which is located in the university’s Research Cyberinfrastructure core facility.

“MSU's high-performance computing cluster is an incredible research asset that can make valuable contributions to institutional partnerships like this one,” said Alison Harmon, MSU’s vice president for research and economic development. “I congratulate Dr. Organ on this groundbreaking work in paleobiology, connecting vision and the evolution of the primate brain.”

Add a Comment »

Thursday, Aug. 6th, 2026

Cutthroat trout conservation project continues in upper Shields River watershed Work to begin August 10


WILSALL –
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, in collaboration with the Custer Gallatin National Forest, will begin additional phases of an ongoing project to conserve native Yellowstone cutthroat trout in the upper Shields River watershed this summer.

Yellowstone cutthroat trout have declined throughout much of their native range primarily due to competition and hybridization with non-native trout species and habitat loss. Yellowstone cutthroat trout populations have especially declined in the upper Shields River watershed largely due to the invasion of non-native brook trout. To mitigate further decline and conserve Yellowstone cutthroat trout in the upper Shields River, FWP and the Custer Gallatin National Forest began removing brook trout in 2022.

This year, fisheries staff will continue removing brook trout from several tributaries to the upper Shields River. The project area is a stronghold for a core conservation population of Yellowstone cutthroat trout at high elevations and the northernmost extent of their range.

This year’s phase of the project will begin next week. Work will take place in Dugout Creek and other areas of the upper Shields River basin.

Brook trout will be removed from the project area using a plant-derived fish toxicant called rotenone. Rotenone is routinely used in fisheries management and breaks down quickly in the aquatic environment. It offers an effective means of removing fish species that are incompatible with the management goals of a fishery without endangering the surrounding ecosystem. Crews will collect Yellowstone cutthroat trout from the project area before rotenone application and return them to the streams when the project is complete. Detoxification stations will be set up to ensure there are no negative effects to gill-breathing organisms downstream of the project area.

To provide for public safety and comply with the rotenone product label, the Custer Gallatin National Forest will issue a closure order during the time of the project. The closure will be in place Aug. 10 through Aug. 18. The entire upper Shields River drainage on National Forest System lands will be closed to recreational access during the treatment as indicated by the closure order and map, which can be viewed on the Custer Gallatin National Forest Alerts website

FWP published an environmental assessment for this project in 2022, hosted public meetings and solicited public comments.

Add a Comment »

Study finds severe snow drought more frequent in western U.S. due to climate change


BOZEMAN
– A team including a Montana State University snow scientist has published research showing that a severe snow drought, like the one that affected the western U.S. in 2026, would occur four times less frequently during the preindustrial period than in the current era of climate change.

The findings were published July 20 by the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Marianne Cowherd, assistant professor in the Department of Earth Sciences in MSU’s College of Letters and Science, together with scientists from the University of Wyoming and Colorado School of Mines, conducted the study.

“What we experienced this spring was really strange, and we wanted to use the tools that we have available to increase our understanding of climate and snowpack,” Cowherd said. “When Bridger Bowl closed early and it was warm in February, people wanted to know if this is because of climate change or is this variability from a normal year? We can use statistics to answer that question.”

Operating under the premise that climate change is human caused, a presumption that Cowherd said has been established in previous studies, the team set out to quantify just how unusual the winter of 2026 was in the study area encompassing 11 Pacific and Mountain West states, including Montana. Using a physics-based computer weather model that incorporates satellite observations and measurements of the amount of liquid water in a snowpack, the team compared the recorded snowpack levels on March 15 for every year in that time span. The results indicated that while the 2026 snowpack did not represent a record low, it measured at or below the 10th percentile across the study area since 1987 – the lowest observed in the western U.S. in that 40-year period.
The team then verified that its computer model could reproduce the 2026 western U.S. snow drought before proceeding to simulate winters under two different climates. The first was today’s climate, from the year 2016 projected out to 2036. The second was the climate of the preindustrial world from 1850 to 1900, before large-scale, human-caused carbon emissions were a factor. Cowherd said that the model’s simulations helped researchers understand what the climate was like in the preindustrial period and established statistical distribution, which is useful for understanding if a drought like 2026’s would have occurred without climate change.

The models predicted that snow drought would occur every 6.8 years in the current climate but once every 30 years in the preindustrial climate.

“We found it is not impossible for these types of events to happen without climate change, but they’re so much more rare,” Cowherd said.

Add a Comment »

Wednesday, Aug. 5th, 2026

How to Rework Your Budget When Housing and Everyday Costs Increase


Housing costs have increased in many communities, while groceries, utilities, transportation, and other everyday expenses continue to put pressure on household budgets. Even people who once felt comfortable managing their finances may find that their monthly income no longer stretches as far as it used to.

Budgets can be adjusted as financial circumstances change. Reviewing where money goes, adjusting spending priorities, and making thoughtful financial decisions can help households adapt to changing circumstances. Reworking a budget takes planning, but small changes made consistently can have a meaningful impact over time.

Start by Understanding Where Your Money Goes

Before making changes, it's important to understand how money is currently being spent. Many people have a general idea of their monthly expenses but may not realize how quickly smaller purchases add up over several weeks. Looking through recent bank statements, credit card transactions, or budgeting apps can provide a clearer picture of current spending habits.

A helpful approach is to separate expenses into fixed and variable categories. Fixed expenses typically include housing, insurance, loan payments, and other bills that remain relatively consistent each month.

Variable expenses, such as dining out, entertainment, shopping, or recreational activities, often fluctuate and may provide opportunities to reduce spending more quickly without affecting essential needs. Larger expenses, such as housing, transportation, or insurance, may also offer savings when changes or renegotiation are possible.

Tracking spending for a full month can also reveal patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed. Instead of focusing on individual purchases, look for categories that consistently exceed expectations. Small but frequent expenses, such as convenience purchases, delivery fees, or recurring digital services, often have a greater impact than occasional larger purchases.

Understanding these spending patterns creates a stronger foundation for every decision that follows. Rather than making random cuts, households can focus on the categories that offer the greatest potential savings while maintaining their overall quality of life.

Prioritize Essential Expenses Before Everything Else

Once spending has been reviewed, the next step is determining which expenses should always receive priority. Housing, utilities, groceries, transportation, healthcare, and insurance generally form the foundation of a household budget because they support daily living and financial stability.

When costs rise, it can be tempting to reduce spending across every category equally. However, treating every expense the same may create unnecessary challenges if essential needs become underfunded. Covering fixed obligations first also provides a clearer picture of how much money remains available for flexible spending and savings goals.

This process may require temporarily reducing discretionary spending. Dining out less often, postponing nonessential purchases, or choosing lower-cost entertainment options can create additional room in the budget without affecting necessities. Smaller adjustments made consistently are often easier to maintain than dramatic lifestyle changes that quickly become difficult to sustain.

Prioritizing essentials also makes future budgeting decisions easier. Once core expenses are accounted for, households can evaluate remaining income more confidently and decide where additional adjustments will have the greatest financial impact.

Review Existing Financial Commitments Before Cutting Essentials

Before reducing spending on essential needs, it's worth reviewing recurring financial commitments that may have changed over time. Some monthly expenses continue automatically without receiving much attention, even though they may no longer reflect current needs or priorities.

Before making deeper cuts elsewhere, consider reviewing:

● Subscription and streaming services,
● Phone and internet plans,
● Insurance policies,
● Existing loan payments,
● Other recurring memberships or automatic payments.

Borrowers with an existing personal loan may also wonder, “can you refinance a personal loan?” Refinancing may reduce monthly payments or the interest rate, but it can also extend the repayment period or increase the total cost of borrowing. Comparing the APR, fees, repayment term, and total cost alongside other recurring expenses can help borrowers determine whether refinancing fits their broader budgeting strategy.

Looking at recurring financial commitments as a whole allows households to identify opportunities for savings before reducing spending on necessities. Even modest reductions across several monthly obligations can improve overall budget flexibility.

Find Practical Ways to Reduce Everyday Costs

Adjusting a budget does not always require major lifestyle changes. Many households find that consistent, practical habits produce meaningful savings over time while allowing them to maintain much of their normal routine.

Meal planning is one example. Creating grocery lists before shopping, preparing meals at home more frequently, and reducing food waste can help control one of the largest variable household expenses. Shopping with a plan also makes it easier to avoid impulse purchases that increase grocery bills.

Energy use is another area worth reviewing. Turning off unused lights, adjusting thermostat settings, using energy-efficient appliances when possible, and reducing unnecessary water usage can gradually lower monthly utility costs. While each adjustment may seem small on its own, the combined savings often become noticeable over several months.

Transportation expenses can also present opportunities for savings. Combining errands into one trip, using public transportation when practical, carpooling, or maintaining a vehicle properly to improve fuel efficiency can reduce monthly costs while supporting long-term budgeting goals.

Build Flexibility Into Your Budget Going Forward

A budget should evolve as financial circumstances change. Rather than viewing a budget as something created once and forgotten, it helps to review it regularly and make adjustments whenever income or expenses shift.

Building flexibility into a budget also means preparing for future changes instead of reacting only after costs increase. Setting aside even a small amount each month for unexpected expenses can reduce financial pressure when repairs, medical bills, or other emergencies occur. Consistency matters more than the amount, since regular contributions gradually strengthen financial resilience.

It's equally helpful to anticipate seasonal expenses such as holidays, back-to-school shopping, higher utility bills during certain months, or annual insurance payments. Planning for these predictable costs throughout the year can reduce the need to make sudden budget adjustments when they arrive.

Most importantly, budgeting should remain realistic. Reviewing the budget every few months, or whenever a major financial change occurs, helps ensure spending continues to reflect current priorities rather than outdated assumptions.

Making Your Budget Work in a Changing Economy

Rising housing and everyday costs can make budgeting more challenging, but they do not necessarily require starting over from scratch. Understanding spending habits, prioritizing essential expenses, reviewing recurring financial commitments, and identifying practical ways to reduce costs can help households adapt to changing financial conditions.

Every financial situation is different, so the best budgeting strategy is one that reflects individual needs and priorities. Making gradual, informed adjustments and reviewing the budget regularly can help create a spending plan that remains both realistic and sustainable as circumstances continue to change.

Add a Comment »

Tuesday, Aug. 4th, 2026

Montana State conference to explore possibilities and challenges of artificial intelligence


BOZEMAN
– Montana State University will host an interdisciplinary symposium Oct. 1-2 to explore the possibilities and challenges of artificial intelligence for human knowledge.

“The Future of AI” conference, sponsored by the Interdisciplinary Institute on Artificial Intelligence at MSU, will be held on campus. Attendance includes lunch and an evening reception on Thursday, and a light breakfast and coffee on Friday. The event is free and open to the public, but registration is required.

“The rise of artificial intelligence has fundamentally transformed how knowledge is created, shared and understood while raising profound intellectual questions that cut across every discipline and field of inquiry,” said Doralyn Rossmann, co-founder of the Institute on Artificial Intelligence and dean of the MSU Library. “As AI becomes increasingly embedded in research, education and public life, we must carefully examine its implications for the production of knowledge and truth.”

The event will feature MSU experts and guest speakers from across the nation to address topics including the modes of research and creative work that are possible with AI, how AI will affect the transmission and preservation of human knowledge, whether AI will be a reliable source of knowledge and whether AI poses a threat to having an informed citizenry.

The conference is designed to allow colleagues to reflect on the opportunities and challenges for conducting research and creative inquiry in the age of AI. A series of moderated workshops will allow for interaction between participants and speakers, and will focus on strategies for universities, nonprofits and businesses to address major questions raised by AI.

Guest speakers are Edward L. Ayers, president emeritus, University of Richmond; Tracy Camp, director, Computing Research Association; Bruce Holsinger, professor of English, University of Virginia; Pietro Perona, Allen E. Puckette Professor of Electrical Engineering and director of Information Science and Technology, California Institute of Technology; Jeffrey Reed, independent scholar, Yellowstone Forever; Elham Tabassi, director of artificial intelligence and emerging technology, Brookings Institution; and Kate Zwaard, executive director, Coalition of Networked Information.

"We have a lot to learn about AI and its implications for Montana and the U.S.,” said William Thomas, co-founder of the Institute on Artificial Intelligence and dean of MSU’s College of Letters and Science. “I'm excited we are bringing some of the world's leading AI scholars and thinkers to MSU. Anyone interested in AI will not want to miss this conference."

More information, a complete schedule of events and the registration link are available online at www.montana.edu/ai/the-future-of-ai/.

Add a Comment »

Thursday, Jul. 30th, 2026

How FNAF Collectibles Have Evolved Alongside the Game Franchise


Five Nights at Freddy's started with surveillance screens, locked doors, power limits, and animatronics that felt clinically still until they moved. Its collectibles have followed that growth, from basic character goods to vinyl figures, plush lines, pins, keychains, and limited releases. Each format now reflects a different phase of the franchise, giving fans physical reference points for designs, story turns, and character memories that still shape our response.

Early Fan Demand

The first licensed wave of FNAF collectibles answered a clear demand: players wanted Freddy, Bonnie, Chica, and Foxy outside the monitor. Early pieces favored front-facing poses, familiar colors, and immediate recognition. That approach fit a series where fear came from repeated sightings, fixed camera angles, and faces that seemed too close.

Mascots Became Shelf Icons

Freddy's original cast translated well because their silhouettes were unusually legible. A hat, hook, bib, ears, or jawline could identify a character before details appeared. That matters in collectible design, where recognition often happens at shelf distance. The figures kept the mascots readable while preserving the uneasy contrast between party-stage charm and predatory stillness.

Plush Took Over

Plush formats changed the emotional temperature of the franchise without softening its identity too much. Rounded fabric, embroidered eyes, and consistent sizing made the characters easier to collect and display. At the same time, Golden Freddy, Toy Bonnie, Shadow Freddy, Cassie, and other plush releases kept enough visual tension to feel tied to the games.

Limited Drops Changed Buying Habits

Limited releases altered the way fans watched new product cycles. A figure became time-sensitive, and a sold-out page became evidence of demand. Fredbear and Spring Bonnie, Ennard, Circus Baby, plus Nightmare characters all show how scarcity entered the habit. Collecting began to involve timing, research, and careful tracking, not just preference.

Later Games Expanded Character Range

New games expanded the cast, and merchandise followed suit. Toy Freddy, Toy Chica, RWQFSFASXC, The Mimic, Gregory, and other later figures reflect more than simple character variety. They show how collecting became tied to eras, mechanics, narrative clues, and shifts in design language across the franchise.

Pins And Keychains Added Scale

Smaller formats gave fans practical ways to collect without needing much display space. Pins and keychains convey a clear character signal on compact surfaces, making them well-suited for backpacks, desks, lanyards, or narrow shelves. A DJ Music Man pin or Shadow Freddy keychain can still mark allegiance to a favorite design.

Horror Designs Became Bolder

The Nightmare line pushed sculpting into sharper teeth, broken forms, darker colors, and more aggressive postures. Nightmare Freddy, Nightmare Bonnie, Nightmare Chica, Nightmare Foxy, and Nightmare Fredbear show how intense designs can become display objects. These releases suit fans drawn to the franchise's harsher visual side, where distortion carries the fear.

Character Variants Added Depth

Variants gave familiar characters renewed collecting value. Chocolate Chica, Easter Bonnie, Freddy Popcorn, Cake Freddy, and Party Mr Cupcake work because the base identities are already established. A seasonal color, food cue, or party reference adds personality without asking fans to learn a new role. Recognition comes first, then the twist hits.

Prices Set Clear Tiers

Current pricing patterns create practical collecting tiers. Many nine-inch plush releases sit near $29.99, while five-inch keychains often appear around $22.99. Pins tend to list near $11.99. Larger vinyl pieces can cost more. Those tiers help collectors balance shelf space, budget, character priority, and format preference with fewer surprises.

Fan Culture Drives Detail

FNAF fans notice small visual cues because the games require close observation. Eye color, accessory placement, naming, and posture can all convey story details. Collectibles respond to that habit by treating minor characters with care. A side figure may matter as much as a mascot when it connects to a theory, scene, or reveal.

Conclusion

FNAF merchandise grew with the franchise because the games kept adding memorable designs, tonal shifts, and story signals. Collectibles now read like a physical timeline, moving from classic mascots to plush variants, pins, keychains, and limited figures. Each release preserves a specific piece of the series. For fans, the value sits in memory, recognition, and the characters that still follow us after the screen goes dark.

Add a Comment »

Wednesday, Jul. 29th, 2026

Montana State football to visit White House to celebrate national championship


BOZEMAN
— The Montana State University Bobcats football team will be in Washington, D.C., July 29, 2026 to be honored at the White House, capping a championship season that ended with the program’s first national title in 41 years.

The Bobcats beat Illinois State 35-34 in overtime Jan. 5 at FirstBank Stadium in Nashville, Tennessee, to win the Football Championship Subdivision title. It was MSU’s first national title since 1984.

“This is a tremendous honor for our entire university and for the state of Montana,” MSU President Brock Tessman said. “Forty-one years is a long time to wait, and our players, coaches and staff earned every bit of this moment through their hard work and determination all season long. We're grateful for the opportunity to be recognized on a national stage once again.”

“Teams at every level of competition, in nearly every sport, have for years been invited to the White House to be recognized for their achievements, and we are all extremely proud that the Montana State Bobcats will join in that tradition,” said Leon Costello, MSU’s director of athletics.

“We also, especially, want to thank the Bobcat donors who supported the trip,” Costello added. “Our student-athletes have this opportunity because of their generosity.”

Montana State finished the season 14-2, defeating Yale, Stephen F. Austin and the University of Montana in the playoffs before beating Illinois State for the title. It was the program's third championship-game appearance in five seasons.

"Our players will remember this trip for the rest of their lives, and they've earned it," head coach Brent Vigen said. "This group answered a hard championship loss two years ago by fighting their way back to the championship game, competing against a tough opponent and finishing the job in overtime. That says everything about who they are."

Add a Comment »

Harrison men plead guilty to multiple wildlife violations in three Montana counties

HARRISON – Two men from Harrison were convicted of multiple hunting violations in Jefferson, Madison and Gallatin counties.

Jeremy Michael Hill and Ryan Francis McGuire faced several charges after the two men were found to have killed multiple deer illegally over several years.

Game wardens with Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks conducted a yearlong investigation into Hill and McGuire following a report from a concerned witness about a wasted whitetail buck found in Hill’s possession. The investigation revealed evidence that Hill, over a three-year period, killed multiple antlered deer each year. Hill also used hunting licenses issued to family members to tag illegally harvested deer.

McGuire aided and abetted Hill as they hunted deer from a vehicle after legal shooting hours.

Their charges included unlawful possession of a game animal, hunting or killing overlimit on deer, unlawful hunting from a public highway, unlawful hunting from a vehicle, unlawful use of equipment while hunting (spotlighting), waste of a game animal, failure to obtain landowner permission for hunting, and failing to validate a general deer license.

Hill was sentenced to a 36-month hunting and fishing privilege suspension and fines totaling $2,980. McGuire was sentenced to a 24-month privilege suspension and fines totaling $670. Montana is part of the interstate wildlife violator compact where violators who lose privileges in one state lose them in all 50 states.

Montana game wardens rely on members of the public being good witnesses in the field and reporting wildlife violations when they happen. Anyone with possible information about crimes against wildlife or state lands is encouraged to visit tipmont.mt.gov to provide details. You may be eligible for a reward of up to $1,000.

Add a Comment »

Monday, Jul. 27th, 2026

Hundreds celebrate grand opening of Combined State Labs building at Montana State

The Montana State University Wool Lab and Combined State Laboratories in Bozeman, Mont. MSU Photo by Marcus "Doc" Cravens

BOZEMAN
— Hundreds of people, including Montana State University faculty, staff, students and alumni, along with community members, legislators and industry professionals, gathered Friday to celebrate the completion of the Combined State Labs building. 

The tri-lab agricultural facility, located on the west side of South 19th Avenue, brings together MSU’s Montana Agricultural Experiment StationWool Lab, the Montana Department of Livestock’s Veterinary Diagnostic Lab, the Montana Department of Agriculture’s Analytical Lab

Established at MSU in 1947, the Wool Lab provides wool testing and research services for sheep producers throughout Montana and the region. The laboratory evaluates wool quality and sheep genetics to help producers improve flock performance, maximize wool value and remain competitive in the marketplace.  

Previously — and famously — headquartered on campus in the little white house near the 11th Avenue roundabout, the Wool Lab is collaboratively managed by MSU’s Department of Animal and Range Sciences and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. The lab also serves as a key facility for training animal science students and conducting outreach with sheep producers.  

The Veterinary Diagnostic Lab supports veterinarians, livestock producers, wildlife managers and government agencies in identifying and monitoring animal diseases. Accredited by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, the laboratory also supports public health through testing for zoonotic diseases and by helping ensure the safety of animal products such as milk and eggs.   

The Analytical Lab provides testing and analytical services that support Montana agriculture and environmental stewardship. The laboratory analyzes feed, fertilizer, pesticides, groundwater and other samples used by producers, researchers and regulatory programs across the state.   

The event’s emcee, Montana Department of Livestock Executive Officer Mike Honeycutt, said the joint facility represents decades of work and “a great partnership” between these three Montana agencies.  

Partnership was a theme throughout the ceremony — not only among the three organizations that share the facility, but also with the producers, industry partners and communities that benefit from the laboratories' research, education, outreach, testing and diagnostic services.  

MSU President Brock Tessman said the university's commitment to agriculture includes conducting research that benefits Montana producers and communities while serving every part of the state.  

“MSU is proud to be part of the agriculture community,” Tessman said. “You can dream bigger, achieve bigger and make a greater impact through partnership.”  

Sreekala Bajwa, MSU’s vice president for agriculture, dean of the College of Agriculture and director of the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, said the facility creates new opportunities for education, research and collaboration while expanding the university's ability to support innovation and strengthen Montana's agricultural sector.  

“This is not just a building, but a testament to what we can achieve,” said Bajwa.  

Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte and U.S. Sen. Tim Sheehy emphasized the importance of investing in agriculture.  
“In Montana, agriculture is the fabric of our world,” Gianforte said. “It’s time that our facilities supporting our producers reach that same world-class level.”  

Sheehy also praised Montana agriculture and the new facility's role in supporting producers.  

“It is incredibly powerful to feed ourselves and the nation,” said Sheehy, speaking to the work of multi-generation producer families. “I am proud of this state’s role in the land-grant mission.”  

Following the opening remarks and ribbon-cutting, attendees toured the new facility and learned about the expanded capabilities now supporting producers and researchers across Montana.  

Brent Roeder, manager of the Wool Lab, said opening the facility is important for new research and teaching opportunities within the wool industry. As one of only two university-associated wool laboratories in the nation, the MSU Wool Lab plays an important role in supporting sheep producers while advancing research on wool quality and natural fibers.  

Construction of the Combined State Labs building began in 2024. The project was made possible through appropriations approved by the Montana Legislature during its 2021 and 2023 sessions, as well as the Montana Board of Regents' approval of using university land for the shared facility.  

The building replaces aging laboratory spaces, some of which were more than 70 years old. The MSU Wool Lab portion of the project also benefited from private donations secured through the MSU Alumni Foundation

Add a Comment »

News Comments